porno
Erkek yeni tanıştığı ateşli dul kadınla beraber kendi evine porno gidiyor Burada kadınla beraber güzel bir an yaşayan erkek gerçekten özel anlar sikiş yaşamak için hareketleniyor Kız arkadaşını hemen iç çamaşırlarıyla beraber erotik hikaye kucağına oturtan erkek onun dudaklarına yumularak çok tatlı hamlelerle porno yalamaya başlıyor Yavaşça pantolonunu çıkaran adam önünde sallanarak sıcak porn delik arayan penisini güzel kızın eline bırakıyor Onun amatör bakışlar ile türk porno önce çekindiğini görüp başını zorla yalattıktan sonra herhalde tadı hoşuna gitmiş porno izle olmalı ki bu sefer sikinden ayıramıyor Uzunca yalayıp ağzından salyalar akan genç sikiş kızın amının da sulandığı vuran ışıkların parıltısından gören adam onu porn izle yatırarak oral seks ile sertleşmiş penisini amının arasına sürterek ıslattıktan porno sonra ayak bileklerinden iki yana ayırarak önünde tabak gibi duran amcığına porno izle sonuna kadar gömüyor İyicene kıvama gelen sevgililer daha sonra yatak odasına giderek burada çıplak kalıyorlar
Wednesday, December 13, 2017
 The Importance of Dairy Ingredient Functionality  

Given the ever expanding list of available dairy ingredients, it has never been more important for manufacturers to understand the functionality of their own ingredients and how to communicate that to food companies developing new products. Functionality testing can provide the key to the characteristics of each ingredient and give the product developer a guide to what each dairy ingredient is “good at”.   We never say that one ingredient is “more functional” than another but that each ingredient, whether it is a whey protein isolate or a milk permeate, has its own unique functionality.  

 

Functionality is usually determined by methods that measure properties such as water binding, emulsification, foaming, gelling or heat stability, to name a few. Unlike our standard methods for measuring the composition of dairy ingredients, functionality methods are not standard. Most of us that do functionality testing have used methods found in dairy ingredient research publications or even modified methods from non-dairy ingredient research.  Composition of a dairy ingredient is the primary driver of functionality differences.  Proteins, fats, and carbohydrates each have unique functions in foods that will translate into different functional properties in a dairy ingredient. The main purpose of a functionality method is to provide a method that can show functional differences between ingredients that vary in composition when a dry dairy ingredient is solubilized in water. Functionality testing can be a useful selling tool for an ingredient and provide a good comparison for a new ingredient, especially if it has some modification from a standard ingredient, ie enhanced wettability, stronger gelling, or greater heat stability. 


During the 17 years that I have been at CDR, I have seen a growing interest in food companies wanting to characterize the dairy ingredients they are currently buying and/or ingredients they may be interested in buying.  Testing the full spectrum of functional properties gives them a functionality portfolio to help them select the dairy ingredient that fits their particular application. It is also information that could be shared with all the product developers in the company.  It may also save a product developer from the age old problem of ordering a dairy ingredient sample for a particular application and having it perform poorly because they didn’t understand how it would function   in their application. Even dairy ingredients with similar composition will have functional differences because of differences in their source or how they are processed. This has always been true for whey ingredients. Measuring functional properties is an important screening tool for manufacturers of dairy ingredients and the users of dairy ingredients.  If you are a manufacturer of dairy ingredients, it could be an important selling tool for you to help differentiate your products and provide more value to your customer.


Posted on Thursday, March 19, 2015 (Archive on Thursday, March 26, 2015)
Posted by bholcomb@adpi.org  Contributed by bholcomb@adpi.org
Return